Page 29 - RMGO 3
P. 29

On a Geometric Theorem                                                     29


                Shall prove that if k > 48, then (1) does not hold for all positive real numbers
                                                             1
            a, b, c and d satisfying a + b + c + d =  1  +  1  +  1  + . Indeed, if we put the vector
              √                                  a   b   c   d

                    2
                         2
               10, √ , √ , √ 2   in (1) we get k ≤ 48, which is false.
                    10   10  10
                Now we prove that if k ∈ [−16, 48] then (1) holds for all positive real numbers
                                                             1
            a, b, c and d satisfying a + b + c + d =  1  +  1  +  1  + .
                                                 a   b   c   d
                            h                               i           h
                                           2
                                                                                       2
                We have: 64 (a + b + c + d) + kabcd − 16 − k − (16 + k) (a + b + c + d) +
                       i            h                       i
                                                  2
            48abcd − 64 = (48 − k) (a + b + c + d) − 16abcd .

                                                         2
                Via Maclaurin’s Inequality, (a + b + c + d) ≥ 16  abc+abd+acd+bcd  = 16abcd
                                                                    a+b+c+d
                 h                              i           h                           i
                                2                                          2
            ⇒ 64 (a + b + c + d) +kabcd−16−k ≥ (16 + k) (a + b + c + d) +48abcd−64 .
                                                                        h
                                              2
                                                                                       2
            But 16 + k ≥ 0 and (a + b + c + d) + 48abcd − 64 ≥ 0 ⇒ 64 (a + b + c + d) +
                          i
                                                 2
            kabcd − 16 − k ≥ 0 ⇒ (a + b + c + d) + kabcd ≥ 16 + k.
                It remains to study the existence of k < −16 for which (1) holds for all positive
                                                                     1
                                                                         1
                                                                 1
            real numbers a, b, c and d satisfying a + b + c + d =  1  + + + . As above, shall
                                                             a   b   c   d
            study first the existence of k < −16 in (2), for all a, b, c, d > 0.
                Again, we may assume WLOG in (2) that a + b + c + d = 4.
                Via AM-GM we get 0 < abcd ≤ 1.
                                           1                          3                1
            Claim 3. The function f : 0,     → (0, 1] as f (t) = (1 + t) (1 − 3t) ∀t ∈ 0,
                                           3                                           3
            is bijectively decreasing.
                                           2
                         0

            Proof. As f (t) = −12t(1 + t) ≤ 0 ∀t ∈ 0,     1    , we deduce that f is strictly
                                                          3
            decreasing. On the other hand, f (0) = 1 and f  1  − 0 = 0; f is continuous, hence
                                                          3
            it is well defined and bijective.
                                 1
            Claim 4. Let t ∈ 0,     be a fixed real number. We consider the positive numbers
                                 3
                                                                3
            a, b, c, d such that a + b + c + d = 4 and abcd = (1 + t) (1 − 3t). Then
                                                                 2
                            max (abc + abd + acd + bcd) = 4(1 + t) (1 − 2t) .
            Proof. Consider the polynomial P (x) = (x − a) (x − b) (x − c) (x − d) on (0, ∞).
                                                          3
                                     3
                               4
                                            2
            We have: P (x) = x − 4x + mx − sx + (1 + t) (1 − 3t) ∀x > 0, where m and s
                                                                                      P(x)
            are positive with s = abc+abd+acd+bcd. Consider now the function g (x) =   x 2
                                                                          0
            on (0, ∞). Since g has 4 positive roots, by Rolle’s Theorem g has at least 3
            positive roots. We have:
                                                         3
                             0
                            g (x) = 2x − 4 +  s  −  2(1 + t) (1 − 3t)  ∀x > 0.
                                             x 2         x 3
   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34